BIGMA II PHOTOS AND COMMENTS
I received my Bigma2 from Amazon late Tuesday, May 18, 2010. It was almost dark, so I was only able to get a few quick "grab" shoots, but my initial impression of the lens from the first image was very positive. I say this because I had some reservations, and was prepared to send it back if it did not meet my specific needs. I am not a "pixel peeper", if you are, you are wasting your time here. Ninety-nine percent of my photos go on our Toy Manchester web site at a size of 900 px at a resolution of 72 ppi. I rarely need to print, so my personal testing of the Bigma is to determine if it will get bird photos on our feeders, taken at a distance of about 60 ft. from our deck, at web resolution that I will be happy with.
Personal stuff - I am 70 years of age, Retired from self-employed computer sales, and I was trained as a Still Picture Photographer, by the U.S. Army at Ft. Monmouth, NJ in early 1958 as a 17 yr old E-5 Staff Sergeant on temporary active duty for training from the 31st Signal Co., 31st "Dixie" Infantry Division of the Alabama National Guard. I have been an active photographic hobbyist since then. I adopted digital 100% in 1996, and I have never looked back. I have a 40D & 7D, Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 17-55 f/2.8 IS, 18-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS, 50mm f/1.8, and now the Bigma2. I sold my 70-200 f/2.8L IS purchased exactly a year ago because it did not have the "reach" I wanted for bird photos, and I rarely used it for anything else. Sold it for what I paid for it, put a hundred bucks with what I got for it, and ordered the Bigma.
So what you will see here is mainly to satisfy myself, but I do hope my images will give you an idea of what the new Bigma2 can do in real world photography. Excluding the cat, photos taken beginning Wednesday morning, 5/19/10. (Update 12-4-10) See last image, but suffice to say, I remain totally pleased with the Bigma2, especially the Optical Stabilization and image sharpness. It has meet my every expectation for what I wanted it for.
Charlie Walker
LAST UPDATE December 4, 2010
Note: I was a bit unsettled to read on dpreview this morning, 6/16/10, that Sigma had made a press release concerning potential problems with the Bigma2, and a couple of other lens. I got downright concerned when I found my Serial Number was right in the middle of the list. I have 2 days left to return the lens to Amazon. So I called Sigma USA in NY and spoke to a Technician. He said if I was not having any problems then I should not be concerned. Candidly I don't belive what he was told to say, but I like the lens, and as I consistently state in this web site, it meets my every expectation. But I got out this afternoon and worked it over good. See the female Cardinal photo further down under date of 6/16/10. I continue to have zero problems. Ultimately we all have to depend on the warranty in the long haul, and it is five years, so I am just putting it out of my mind, and continuing to enjoy this very excellent product.
Note: I downloaded Adobe Lightroom 3 today, 6/8/10, and I notice it supports the Bigma2 in the lens correction module. I will be using this module routinely on images taken after today. Sometime in the next few days, I will try to get an image posted that is processed in LR3 with and without using the lens correction. I have used LR since it was Raw Shooter Premium, and I am a huge fan. Note - I really don't see any difference using lens correction, but I routinely do it anyway on all my Bigma2 images.
If you are interested in seeing what I photograph most, it's here www.cwalker.net/manchesters CLICK HERE
WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON PHOTOS
Male (L) and Female American Goldfinch. Settings same as the image above, but I believe this one shows the real capability of the Bigma II. We have only been seeing these beauties in the winter and in winter coat. We get bunches of them, but it is only recently that we have seen them in their summer plumage. Probably because of the addition of the platform feeder with sunflower seed. You do not have to buy Niger seed, they come to sunflower seed just as readily, and it is much less expensive.
div>
Same specifications as female Cardinal photo above except 1/200 sec and 5.31 M subject distance.